Is ‘Fair Use’ Really Fair to Artists Under Indian Copyright Law?

In India, the debate surrounding copyright laws, especially in relation to ‘fair use’ or what we call ‘fair dealing’, has become increasingly relevant. There have been numerous instances of independent artists—like photographers, filmmakers, and writers—accusing big media organizations of using their work without giving due credit or compensation. This raises a vital question: Is it fair for media organizations to use independent artists’ creations without acknowledgment?

A Recent Case

One standout case that highlights this issue involved Ronny Sen, an Emmy-nominated filmmaker and photographer. In December, he filed a civil suit against Zee News, seeking ₹18 crore in damages. Ronny accused Zee News of using his exclusive footage documenting the transportation of cheetahs from Africa to India without permission. This situation is alarming, as it illustrates a larger problem where artists feel their rights are overlooked.

Ronny expressed his outrage, stating that Zee News not only utilized his work but also falsely claimed exclusive access to it. He pointed out that this isn’t the first time this has happened; back in 2014, Zee News’s Bengali channel used one of his photographs during a university protest without his consent. Ronny argued that Zee News cannot use ‘fair use’ as a defense because they used the image repeatedly and falsely positioned it as their own.

Understanding Fair Dealing

In India, ‘fair dealing’ offers a framework for determining when the use of copyrighted material is acceptable. According to Section 52 of the Copyright Act, certain uses—like criticism, review, and news reporting—are considered non-infringing. However, the law does not clearly define what constitutes fair dealing, making it somewhat ambiguous.

Legal experts like Pankhuri Upadhyay highlight that while commercial use is not automatically disqualified in India, it is subject to closer scrutiny. The amount of the work used is also significant; even a short excerpt can be held against fair dealing if it captures the essence of the original work.

Another crucial aspect is the mandatory author attribution in news reporting which aims to protect the rights of creators. However, even permitted uses must not misrepresent or distort the original work in a way that harms the artist’s reputation.

The Challenge for Independent Artists

Ronny isn’t the only artist facing this issue. Many photographers express frustration at how their work is often exploited. They feel that there is a noticeable shift in media where organizations no longer hire photographers but instead use images created by anyone, usually without consent.

Gauri Gill, a well-known photographer, shared her dismay when she discovered that prominent media outlets had used her unpublished photos taken from her private Instagram account. This incident highlighted how an artist’s creative work can be co-opted by larger organizations for profit, without any acknowledgment or payment.

Subhrajit Sen, another photographer, faced a similar dilemma. A major television network used his original photographs while claiming credit for them. Subhrajit highlighted that this kind of exploitation reflects poorly on journalism’s ethical standards and undermines the rights of artists.

The Legal and Financial Burden

Legal expert Anshumaan Sahni pointed out a significant challenge: independent artists often don’t have the resources to enforce their copyrights effectively. Larger organizations typically have the means and systems in place to tackle infringement, leaving independent creators at a disadvantage.

Claiming damages for infringement can be complicated due to the initial legal costs involved. Many budding artists, who may not yet have a significant track record, find it virtually impossible to venture into court due to financial constraints. Legal measures such as takedown notices can sometimes suffice, but many artists lack the knowledge or means to pursue them.

A Call for Change

The prevailing situation calls for collective management organizations that can help artists enforce their rights more effectively. By pooling resources, independent artists might be able to level the playing field against large corporations that often disregard their work.

Ultimately, while ‘fair use’ aims to allow for the use of copyrighted work in specific circumstances, its application can be heavily skewed in favor of media organizations. Artists like Ronny Sen, Gauri Gill, and others deserve more recognition and legal protection for their creative contributions. The current system must evolve to ensure that the rights of independent creators are respected and upheld.

Hashtags

CopyrightAwareness #FairUse #ArtisticRights #RespectCreators #SupportIndependentArtists #IndianCopyrightLaw #MediaEthics #PhotographyRights #CreativeCommunity #ProtectArtists

Original Text – https://scroll.in/article/1090059/is-fair-use-really-fair-to-artists-under-indian-copyright-law?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=public